The "Donroe" approach
The "Donroe" approach—a combination of the names "Donald Trump" and "Monroe"—is not unreasonable from a geopolitical perspective. However, from an operational standpoint, it has encountered some initial challenges.
The available resources are more abundant than the incentives to motivate them. There are sticks in Mainland (Colombia and Venezuela). There is a glimmer of hope in Mexico. There are indications of the presence of carrots in Argentina, albeit with the use of some form of bribery, and in Brazil, negotiations are underway to solidify this.
It is widely acknowledged that the United States' primary focus after the Asia-Pacific region is Latin America. Despite the ongoing emergencies in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, EMEA has shown resilience and has advanced to new levels. Trump and his potential successors have expressed a vision that includes securing the Western Hemisphere and expelling China from the region.
The well-known rift, known as the "Thucydides trap," appears to be narrowing in Washington's favor. As the saying goes, Westerners wear watches and count on time. The issue is that Xi has disregarded this norm, emulating Mao's approach by acting more like a Western leader. This has led to a premature challenge to the United States, potentially jeopardizing the timing and strategic implications of such a move.
However, it is not sufficient to attempt to remove the Chinese with the support of allied governments, trade agreements, and well-intentioned efforts.
It is evident that the United States seeks to circumvent the challenges posed by immigration from Latin American countries, which have been a point of concern under the Obama administration.
To this end, it is imperative for the United States to extend support to its political allies in Latin America, fostering sustainable growth and development in the region.

Comments
Post a Comment